Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Progressive Scum and Pedophilia - The New Normal?

If anything is truly inevitable, it is that after our liberal rulers have finished establishing disgusting, disease-spreading homosexual depravity as officially “normal,” they will continue to push the envelope. The most likely direction? Pedophilia:
Some of the scientists say pedophilia is a sexual orientation, meaning that it’s unchangeable, regardless of how much jail time or beatings or therapy someone is dealt. Others have reason to believe that pedophiles are born that way, and that some of them will suffer through entire lives without hurting a single child. If this research proves to be correct, it should help shape both our public policy and our public attitude, so that we’re protecting kids while also protecting pedophiles from angry mobs, cellmates, and themselves.
Sound familiar? Within five years public figures will cower in terror when they are denounced by militant perverts as pedophobes. Once we have renounced the notion that we are responsible for our own behavior, there is nothing that the degenerate liberal elite can’t or won’t insist we regard as normal. If gut-level revulsion on the part of all decent, healthy people were an obstacle, progressives would have been stopped long ago. When killing them in utero just isn't enough anymore...

13 comments:

  1. What exactly are your thoughts on GLBT people? We have pretty rational, respectful exchanges in the comments on this site and then you talk about "disgusting, disease-spreading homosexual depravity." I don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry to hear that, but I'm going to continue standing up to the disease of permissive progressivism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that's a little bit of mislaid blame. It's not as if MPQ is the one trying to identify pedophilia as a "new orientation" and trying to get it classified as one would gay/lesbian/bisexual.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not politically correct enough is the real problem. People hate me for it. Too bad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't hate you for anything, I'm asking a question in good faith.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought my POV was pretty clear-I'm sick of the 'anything goes' sexual free for all of proggies, straight or gay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Still trying to understand completely - do you consider gay people having sex with each other, under any circumstances, to be a sexual free-for-all? As in, do you consider a committed, monogamous same-sex couple to be disgusting, disease-spreading and depraved?

      Delete
  7. No, I'm talking about the permissive, clusterfuck attitudes of extremists. I guess I should have chosen my words more carefully here, I can see now where it looks like a condemnation of everyone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay, now we're understanding each other again. :)

      Delete
    2. Sigh. As a Christian, I often feel between a rock and a hard place when it comes to gay issues. I will defend the Word of God but that doesn't mean I want gay people living in caves alone and miserable either. It's why I don't usually blog on gay issues-inevitably someone gets hurt by it, but it's the conundrum of pleasing people vs. pleasing God. In the future I think I'll leave gay issues to gay folks. Hard to explain and easy to be misunderstood. I often wonder if gay people gt it, and when they do its probably difficult for them too. Personally, if I was gay I'd be offended by others co-opting my choices to promote depravity against children. It's all a confusing mess, IMO.

      Delete
    3. If you were gay, you'd probably phrase it as "my sexuality" or "my orientation," not "my choices." ;)

      I think one thing that's important to remember is that when it comes to GLBT people, there are thousands who simply are not political. They're busy paying the bills or driving the kids or wrapping up last-minute things at work or watching TV. There's not necessarily any big ideological connection between Person A and Person B because they're both gay, anymore than there's necessarily any ideological connection between C and D because they're both straight.

      Thanks for taking the time to help me get this all cleared up. :)

      Delete
    4. Glad you stuck around :) I'd miss your wisdom.

      Delete
  8. The most recent post here might make it more clear-it seems to me the gay agenda is being used to promote the anything-goes agenda.

    ReplyDelete